Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Regional Centers

The Regional Centers serve people who can't live in the community, even with support. In general, they serve people with developmental disabilities who also have:
  • a history of sex offenses
  • severe behavioral or psychological issues
  • severe medical problems

Many of the people in the RCs would otherwise be in prison.

The Regional Centers


Colorado has 3 regional centers. They're in:

The Regional Centers offer two kinds of services:
  • Institutional services called Intermediate Care Facilities for the Mentally Retarded (ICFs/MR)
  • state-operated group homes that serve 4-6 people

All three of the centers have state-operated group homes. Grand Junction and Wheat Ridge also have institutional ICF/MR facilities.

High-needs Patients


The Department measures capacity, the number of people it can serve in Regional Services, in "beds." For licensing purposes, the beds in Regional Centers fall into different categories:
  • Home- and Community-Based Medicaid waiver (HCBS-DD) (295 of these beds)
  • Intermediate Care Facility for the Mentally Retarded (ICF/MR) (108 beds)

Over the past few years, the level of services required for people at the centers has gone up. That's forcing the Departent to adjust its staffing ratio (the number of staff per patient) to the more severe patients.

No one knows for sure why we suddenly have so many people with severe problems. It spiked in the Spring of 2007 and has stayed high ever since. It may just be a statistical anomaly.

They're concentrated at the Regional Centers partially because it's hard to keep them in the community and partially because of changes in policy:

  • Since April 2003, the regional centers have used the following admissions criteria:
  • extremely high needs requiring very specialized professional medical support services
  • extremely high needs due to challenging behaviors
  • pose significant community safety risks to others and require a secure setting
  • Since April of 2008 the Regional Centers have required CCBs to remove someone from a center in order to send a new person in, which means the CCBs have been swapping lower-need patients for higher-need patients.

Regardless of the reasons, the Regional Centers have a larger number of people who need intensive services. Normal staffing is 3-to-1; three patients per employee. Some high-need patients require 1-to-1 supervision 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

One-to-one staffing for one patient requires 5.4 full time employees; that's 3 people per 24-hour day over 7 days, plus reserve staff to cover sick/vacation days.

Adjusting the Staffing Ratio


The Regional Centers are trying to adjust their staffing ratios to match the new needs. They're doing it in three ways:
  • increasing the number of staff
  • reducing the number of patients
  • converting existing beds to ICF/MR and building new ICF/MR facilities

This year the Department is asking for 43 new employees. Over five years, it intends to reduce the number of patients in the Regional Centers from 403 to 307.

Opposition to the Plan

The ARC of Colorado says effects of the Department's plan are "intolerable.

Increasing the staffing level at the Regional Centers by reducing the number of patients they accept means turning away people. That leads to an obvious question: what's happening to people who would otherwise be in the regional centers?

Prison is one obvious alternative. The ARC of Colorado says at least a dozen people are behind bars because they can't get into a regional center. People with behavioral problems often break the law, repeatedly. Without proper care, they wind up in a cycle of increasingly-long stints in jail or prison. It's an uncomfortable fact the putting high-need disabled people in prison is cheaper than caring for them in a regional center.

Others will wind up in hospitals. The ARC says it knows about two such cases already. That's not a good situation for the people with disabilities, and it puts unnecessary pressure on the health care system.

DHS says to get the right staffing ratio while keeping the same number of beds available would take 200 new employees. That would cost -- ballpark -- about $7 million.

The Governor is recommending that we spend $6 million this year to reduce the DD wait list. We could put some, or all, of that money into staffing the regional centers. It's a tough choice. Spending themoney on community services adds services to hundreds of people; spending it on regional centers would help far fewer.

Thursday, September 25, 2008

Construction Freeze


"No, really, we've been working on this
already-started project for, like, ever."
If you saw department directors or university presidents running around with shovels today, here's why: we're delaying the start of any new capital construction projects (new meaning not started by Oct. 1st) while we assess the state's financial situation. That puts the pressure on the get projects into the "started" category.

Governor Ritter announced the freeze today. It applies to $75 million worth of projects in the FY 2008-09 budget that haven't started and aren't necessary for public health and safety.

A lot of projects are built in phases which means they'll shut down after the current phase is completed. Projects that are already underway or were funded in previous years' budgets will continue. So will controlled maintenance projects.

The projects are officially delayed until January 31st of 2009. Department directors and higher ed CEOs can ask OSPB for an exception to the freeze.

Here's a list of the delayed projects:



















































































AgencyTitleCost
UCCSScience/Engineering Building$7,000,000
FLCBerndt Hall Reconstruction$15,699,453
CSU-Fort CollinsClark Building$2,000,000
CU-BoulderEkeley Renovation$11,559,536
CU-BoulderKetchum$8,435,946
CSMHall of Justice Demo/Classrooms$3,516,697
PCCLearning Center$2,971,482
DMVAGrand Junction Readiness Center$3,994,432
Human ServicesCMHIFL Cottage A/C$1,806,035
Human ServicesKipling Village Remodel$400,340
UNCButler Hancock Interior$3,000,000
CSU-PuebloAcademic Resource Center$2,797,436
CSMBrown Hall Addition$2,000,000
CNCCCraig Academic Center$1,990,056
CorrectionsFort Lyon Expansion$7,162,494


For a more detailed look at the capital projects, click here.

Hiring Freeze

The state isn't going to be hiring new employees while we figure out how much the financial meltdown is going to lower state revenues.

Gov. Ritter announced the freeze today. It technically takes effect on Oct. 1, but it applies to any jobs that haven't been offered and accepted by Sept 29th.

No General-Funded and Cash-Funded positions can be filled unless OSPB grants an exemption.

The freeze doesn't apply essential personnel including jobs critical to protecting health, life and safety.

The Governor's order only applies to the executive branch, but other parts of the state will probably go along to some extent. Other parts are those run by independently-elected officers, like the Secretary of State, the Attorney General and the Treasurer, the Judiciary and Higher Education.

Monday, September 22, 2008

C SAFE Run

Local governments try to get the most out of their money, but they don't want to take risks with public money. So they keep their day-to-day spending money in checkable money market accounts. The accounts earn some interest, the districts can write checks right out of the funds and, most of all, they're safe. Or were save until the financial wizards of Wall St. started drowning in their own greed.

One of the country's largest (and oldest) money market fund just froze its assets to protect itself against an “It's a Wonderful Life” - type run on its assets.

Of course in this version of the movie Jimmy Stewart would be saying:

“I don't have your money, it's in Mr. Sullivan's $47 million severance package, in the Bear Stearns bailout and a hundred other schemes for protecting rich and powerful people from their own ineptitude and malfeasance.”

Local governments in Colorado keep their spending money in two privately-managed funds. One is called the Colorado Trust and the other is called the Colorado Surplus Asset Fund Trust (CSAFE).

About 360 local governments (including school districts, water districts, etc.) put their money in CSAFE. CSAFE, in turn, invests, some of the money in three money market funds. Two of them have frozen their assets and the third is probably thinking about it. It totals up to about $1 billion out of the fund's total of $2.5 billion assets.

The money itself is probably safe. “We don't have concerns about losses here,” said State Treasurer Cary Kennedy. The problem is liquidity. Credit markets are tight and the money market funds can't get their hands on enough cash to cover all of the immediate requests for withdrawals. That means CSAFE can't withdrawal as much money as it needs to meet the requests it's getting from the local districts.

CSAFE is managing the crisis by limiting local governments to withdrawing no more than 5% of their assets per day. It's handling critical needs for more money on a case-by-case basis.

Kennedy says that's OK for now, but if it goes on too long, some districts are going to have trouble paying their bills.

Wednesday, September 17, 2008

Big Growth at CSU-Pueblo

CSU-Pueblo is going through a growth spurt that's both a consequence of and cause for cash-funded capitol construction.

Over the past few years, CSU-Pueblo had added a student recreation center, completely funded with student fees, and a stadium to bring the football team back on campus using money from private donors.

It's making the school more attractive and enrollment is up nearly 12% this year. The surge in students is overwhelming the dorms and the university is housing some freshmen in a nearby hotel. It's a temporary situation because the campus is adding student housing.

In the Fall of 09, Phase 1 of it's student housing expansion will open with 250 beds. Next Monday CSU will ask the JBC to OK Phases 2 & 3 of the housing project. They're both 202 projects, so JBC approval shouldn't be much more than a formality.

Thunderbowl Stadium
The Neta and Eddie DeRose Thunderbowl Stadium just hosted it's first college football game. The project cost $13.6 million.